Trim down the huge tables in the middle of the proposal.2018-05-10T23:50:44+00:00Mike Perrymikeperry-git@torproject.org2018-05-10T23:50:44+00:000e6f859298b47410c758292c2c1a8aea46b88abe
Mesh vanguards tweaks from asn's review.2018-05-10T23:37:45+00:00Mike Perrymikeperry-git@torproject.org2018-05-10T23:37:45+00:00a47600b4ac1e726df3c00d1dfd1b234b0f2e1822
Write a proposal for the mesh vanguards design.2018-05-08T22:05:08+00:00Mike Perrymikeperry-git@torproject.org2018-05-08T21:14:43+00:00d588585d1cb37d5f8f0002692ba6dcb0bd0f552e
Prop 247: Some notes from mailinglist discussion2016-01-27T21:47:24+00:00Mike Perrymikeperry-git@torproject.org2016-01-27T21:47:24+00:006cf56f1eb2247642ac54981cee5a5bcf1ab5dcd0
Add nodes from mailinglist discussion.2016-01-15T17:01:47+00:00Mike Perrymikeperry-git@torproject.org2016-01-15T16:53:47+00:004121ecf13ebd61046f322e2ae098ac0a1bc03e49
Add my removing-obsolete-clients proposal as 2662016-01-14T16:24:16+00:00Nick Mathewsonnickm@torproject.org2016-01-14T16:24:16+00:0099acfe0bb19f0a0bcb7c1ec4866c817d91ade7c8
add proposal 265: Load Balancing with Overhead Parameters2016-01-14T16:21:40+00:00Nick Mathewsonnickm@torproject.org2016-01-14T16:21:40+00:00bee44ba05fc37191353177e57b7f6f1d42d8468e
In addition to the content, explain the format too2016-01-14T15:30:12+00:00Sven Herzbergsven.herzberg@cluepunk.com2016-01-13T16:43:53+00:00f9e111ead769d48441d99b52039ef0ccbd3f2c62
The term “X509 certificate” actually only describes one part of the
format. Be more explicit to mean DER encoded certificates (in contrast to
PEM encoded certifcates).
The term “X509 certificate” actually only describes one part of the
format. Be more explicit to mean DER encoded certificates (in contrast to
PEM encoded certifcates).